- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Pouët (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A website that has received no coverage in reliable sources. Fails Wikipedia:Verifiability. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant coverage found.--Michig (talk) 13:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per Michig, I can't find anything. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.