Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yttrium(III) oxide (data page)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No one besides the original nominator argues for deleting the content outright. Merging the data is an editorial decision that anyone can perform if they feel like it. - Bobet 18:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yttrium(III) oxide (data page) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article only provides one physical property Inwind 18:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't see a reason why we can't have an article for this element, but it should contain more info. Perhaps notify the creator or consider contribuing more. I found several references to the properties of this element ++Arx Fortis 00:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. These sorts of pages are a consequence of the way Template:Chembox has been written. Spacepotato 01:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. To expand on this, when the template Template:Chembox was being written, it was decided that putting all chemical properties in the infobox would lead to an excessively bloated box. Therefore, the chembox has a link (Supplementary data page) which leads to supplememtary data pages like this one. They can be thought of as part of the infobox. Spacepotato 00:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not disputing the main article on Yttrium(III) oxide. However, for properties to be noteworthy for 'exotic' compounds I feel that there should be some reference in the article to relate to that particular property. May be someone can help and add a reference to the thermal conductivity. Inwind 05:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Yttrium(III) oxide. Peterkingiron 00:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge content with Yttrium(III) oxide and delete this one as this is an unlikely search term anyway. --Polaron | Talk 01:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.